Q&A with Special Rep of the Secretary General for Children and Armed Conflict

Summary of Briefing by Radhika Coomaraswamy, who was appointed first in April 2006 and then again in February 2007 as UN Secretary-General’s Under-Secretary-General, Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict.  In this capacity, and as a lawyer by training, she has provided her moral voice to serve as an independent international human rights advocate to build awareness regarding the rights and protection of boys and girls affected by armed conflict

 Edit Print E-mail

Please contact Sarah Gogel, UN Representative for FAWCO, for more information about this briefing.

 

“May I Ask a Question, Special Representative of the Secretary General for Children and Armed Conflict?”

Summary of Briefing by Radhika Coomaraswamy,

May 21, 2009, 10h15 a.m.-12h15 p.m., Conference Room 2

by Sarah Gogel


 

Today’s briefing of the Department of Public Information (DPI) Non-Governmental Organizations, was moderated by Mr. Eric Falt, Director, Outreach Division in the DPI and led by Radhika Coomaraswamy, who was appointed first in April 2006 and then again in February 2007 as UN Secretary-General’s Under-Secretary-General, Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict.  In this capacity, and as a lawyer by training, she has provided her moral voice to serve as an independent international human rights advocate to build awareness regarding the rights and protection of boys and girls affected by armed conflict.  Additionally, Ms. Coomaraswamy has served as former Chairperson of the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission and was an outstanding Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women from 1994 to 2003.  In April, 2009, she visited the Republic of the Congo to get a first-hand look at the state of children who have lived through years of armed conflict.  Ms. Coomaraswamy is a graduate of Yale and has a Masters in Law from Harvard.

It was an honor to hear from Ms. Coomaraswamy today.  She started out her presentation by insisting that if we do not put a face to the children suffering and whom have gone through war, we will not get very far in the discussion.  Thus, she briefly introduced the story of Grace Akallo, who was abducted by the Ugandan rebels in 1996 along with 139 other girls, when she was 15 years old.  At that time, Grace was going to a convent run by Italian nuns in Aboke.  She was held in captivity for seven months and forced to be a child soldier and sex slave as she was repeatedly raped by an LRA commander.  During that time, she was trained to clean and dismantle guns in Sudan, forced to abduct other children and to kill.  Many of her girl peers were “given as wives” to the rebel soldiers.   

By miracle, Grace Akallo escaped and walked for three days from a village where she was supposed to kill more people and was turned in to the Ugandan soldiers. Thereafter, she returned to the same Italian convent from where she had been abducted. This former child soldier has now turned activist, lobbying for rights of children in conflict zones around the world in the USA.  She received her BA from Gordon College in Boston, Massachusetts. Ms. Coomaraswamy then continued with her presentation after this moving account and showing a short video of Grace speaking on April 29, 2009, at the UN meeting of the Security Council on Children and Armed Conflict.  Everyone present from UNICEF and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations responded to her with resounding claps and appreciation for testimony, expressing their full commitment.

Ms. Coomaraswamy explained that the Secretary General Ban-Ki Moon is working diligently to move forward on detailing more strategies to prevent the use of child soldiers internationally.  For example, his report presented to the Council “names and shames” from 56 countries and non-state actors engaging in recruitment of child soldiers.  Out of this list, 19 are said to be persistent violators, i.e. listed for over four years.  Thanks to this Working Group of the UN Security Council, slow strides have been made.  This should hopefully continue to be successful so that the Security Council can continue getting involved with moral and social issues. 

For example, six former offenders newly signed on to protection plans for children affected by armed conflict and were thereafter dropped from the list.  Additionally, this list has served to identify thousands of child soldiers who were released because of the targeted measures which could be turned against the countries which remain on the list.  However, Ms. Coomaraswamy reminds us that this list is not perfect and indeed should expand to create targeted measures beyond child soldiers, in order to protect all children of war such as those inflicted by sexual violence, sexual abuse, intentional killing and maiming.  This would further help move forward the issue of accountability.  There is a deterrent effect to combat impunity of crime against children.  The Secretary-General gives his full support and his Presidential Statement at the Security Council showed signs to move forward to makes these issues be on the list of shame.

The first case that Ms. Coomaraswamy’s office filed was at the ICC: an amicus for a broad interpretation of child soldiers, so that the law protects children even though they are not combat fighter.  The resolution of 1612 shows that this issue of child soldiers is at this point the only human rights issue the Security Council is really engaged in.  This resolution is a monitoring system which lists parties that kill, recruitment efforts of child soldiers, attacks on schools and abductions. So far there have been six violations.  The abuse of children is reported in this infamous list of shame and Council approved of this method, first in 1997 and again in 2005.  A working group on violations against children was set up, with a monitoring system to report back to Council. The latter has acted on issue of children.  For example, 1200 children were released in North Kivu. 
Ms. Coomaraswamy insists that reintegration of children and sustainable development is necessary to provide them with alternative and viable lifestyles.  This needs to be inclusive and community-based, so that children can learn skills.  It is not sufficient to expect that six months will suffice in this recovery process, and donors need to recognize this in order to prevent further re-recruitment, frequent after six months of attempts of reintegration.  A connection with daughters needs to be established to further prevent re-recruitment, and it is crucial to carry out humanitarian work as part of the planning process. This should be done through education and advocacy.  It is essential to ensure that Internally Displaced children are physically secure, with education, psychosocial and health support.  Indeed, there are always new challenges due to the changing nature of warfare and conflict: children are now recruited as suicide bombers, girl schools are being bombed, and increasing amount of children are in detention.  The proliferation of small arms has made it so that children can carry and use weapons.  However, these changes should not deter the legislation to move forward, on the contrary they should only inspire us further. It is clear that the element of children hits a chord among people more than other issues do, and this has allowed governments to go forward with a certain good will.  However, Ms. Coomaraswamy says that the United Nations is able to debate about issues for a long time, and more action is necessary at a faster pace. 
Question: How can we help this situation from within the USA?
  • Answer: It is important to raise awareness around the world about issues that are there and to lobby as well as reach out to senators and Congressmen.  One can raise awareness about the Child Accountability Act in USA, which makes it a crime without regard to immigration status. More information to donors regarding the right type of aid (i.e. reintegration and education) is also essential.
 Question: What are other pathways to peace? Instead of going to high-up powers, can we not go to high schools? Young people go to movies to be entertained as opposed to becoming activists about important issues such as this one, how can this be changed? 
  • Answer: Going to high schools is one of the things Ms. Coomaraswamy does and promotes.  For example, she went to Bedford Stuyvesant in Brooklyn, New York, last year to teach high school students about the issue of child soldiers.  She thought it was really interesting and also showed a film to make these issues come alive.  October 23, 2009, she will be going to another high school.  Moral outrage that we expect is crucial but unfortunately in many concerned countries or even in the USA, some people still ask why this should be considered a crime.  This is mainly due to a lack of awareness of the consequences of this on children, for example that child soldiers have earlier deaths and their vulnerability is exploited.
 Question:  War and chaos deprive young people of elderly folks with no one to guide them and the elderly survive more than the young.  The kids then are deprived of their support service. What can be done for this generational problem? 
  • Answer: Elderly people are also very vulnerable in wartime, not only during the war but in the camps as well.  Actually, they are the ones who die first.  That is why the integration of children should not focus on solely the individual and it is widely known now that the child will heal better inside his or her own community.  Simultaneously, the relationships with elderly can be reestablished through participation of all members of society.
 Question: Children would rather be punished than be ignored, so they choose to fight if they are ignored.  How related is this issue with women's issues such as unwanted pregnancy which can lead to rejection of kids? 
  • Answer: To some extent, recognition is indeed necessary. However, compulsion and force are also at stake.  Some of the issue can be handled by incorporating women’s issues: sexual violence and sexual exploitation are very relevant and the reason why women get involved is important to further explore.
 Question:  Is it possible to create a global home for all those children? 
  • Answer: As a rule, UNICEF and other NGOs are against institutional homes and prefer to bring children back to their homes or foster families.  The strategy is to surround children with nurture and care.
 Question: What special problems do girls face in their communities and how do you work with CEDAW? 
  • Answer: Interestingly, girls do not show success in programs focusing on integration.  They have many more problems than boys, have more psychosocial needs.  For example, in Nepal girls who were forced to be soldiers do not want to go back to be a submissive girl at home.  Thus, they have a lot of social issues and pose far greater issues especially if they are victims of sexual violence. However, we need to remember the numerous stories of resilience such as Grace Akallo’s.  A network has been created to connect child soldier survivors.  As far as working with CEDAW, there is no direct work but rather through the Child’s Rights Convention and reinforcement of their recommendations.
 Question: What do you do with children who are part of the rebels and can't come out? 
  • Answer: It is important to actually go talk to rebel leaders with permission of governments and tell them that they are on the shame list.  Mrs. Coomaraswamny said that this has worked thus far to delist five groups. For example, this is the method that was used to delist the military of Uganda. Despite the difficult negotiation, groups do not appreciate to be on this list.  There are three types of groups, including those that are too bloody minded to see clearly about anything list-related. However, in general, most groups find themselves in the middle, that is they recruit child soldiers without giving it much thought.  This group is the most likely to be successful in terms of outreach projects to prevent child soldier recruitment since they often can be talked to.
 Question: What is the age range in which children are categorized as such and are there different levels of psychological damage? 
  • Answer: Child soldiers’ age is an issue relevant to the mandate of the International Criminal Court (ICC), because when children are younger than 15 years old this is considered international crime. However, 18 is the protocol age as per the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Armies can recruit 16 to 18 year old children, but they are not allowed into conflict areas.  Trafficked children, especially those internally displaced are at highest risk of being recruited as soldiers or for sexual violence.
 Question: Can you talk more about the list of shame? 
  • Answer: The report has two annexes. Annex one has parties listed by name who are not on the Security Council.  Annex two consists of those on the Security Council. Since the beginning, there have been 19 lists of shame.  Resolution 1612 (2005) states that targeted sanctions could be implemented against repeat offenders.  For example, those who are mandated like in Cote d'Ivoire, Burundi and Sudan have aspirations. In Cote d’Ivoire there are no recent cases of child soldiers, and Sierra Leone and Liberia are no longer on the list of shame.  Groups like Al Quaida or the Taliban however are obviously not interested.
 Question: Is it effective to bring military commanders to justice for trafficking children? 
  • A: Many overlap but the legal regime remains International Humanitarian Law specifically on recruitment of children, mainly under the International Criminal Court (ICC). The International Labor Organization spearheaded a movement by saying that trafficked children is equal to forced labor.  However, it remains that the ICC punishes Crime Against Humanity more so than it does forced labor.
 Question:  Can UNICEF make a linkage so that senior citizens go speak to students about these issues? 
  • Answer: To some extent, UNICEF already has these types of programs.  Since the past three years, UNICEF has insisted that children be represented and assist meetings where they can have a voice about issues that are of concern to them and to find solutions. This is also the idea behind the network of survivors.
 Question: Can you tell us more about children who are born in the guerillas, especially in Latin America like Colombia?  
  • Answer: During Mrs. Coomaraswamy’s recent trip to Nepal, child combatants came to speak to her regarding wanting to stay in the army. They held a two-hour meeting to explain other options other than joining the army.  Six months reintegration during peace time is evidently not sufficient to bring back these children to a normalcy that will allow them not to think of retaking their guns.
 Question: What measures are taken internationally to prevent children to become soldiers? 
  • Answer:  The ICC or Security Council can prevent.  UNICEF and UNDP try to guard against recruitment. They work with partners on the ground.  Conventions are pushed forward and many attempts are made to punish perpetrators. The ICC is based on consent jurisdiction so the country signs on or the Security Council can intervene such as with the recent indictment of Sudan’s president.
 Question: What type of interaction does your office have with the Human Rights Council? 
  • Answer: We report our files annually in September with the Council, but they don't have a resolution.  That is one of the big debates going on in the Council.  Some are keen because they see this as a peace and security issue.  We are trying to push them to write some type of resolution on children and conflict.
 Question: How is recruitment of minors manifested through terrorism? 
  • Answer: It becomes manifest when some children are recruited as child suicide bombers. Another example is the attacks on girl school.  To combat this prevention becomes primordial.
 Question: What can be done to separate out the exact issues that rebels are fighting about? 
  • Answer: Many rebel groups have a political base and this has to be understood first and foremost.  For example, ethnic wars causing grievances often has consequences of children joining because they saw their parents humiliated or they were humiliated.  Governments need to work on this in order to start separating out the real issues at hand.
 Question: What actions can NGOs take to partake in this prevention effort? 
  • Answer: Congressmen should be contacted and your constituents mobilized towards this effort.  Interestingly, the USA is not taking the lead on the issue of child soldiers because it has less press than the issue of trafficking. 
 Question: What about the Commissioner's Office on Human Rights or any reviews?  
  • Answer: The Committee on the Rights of the Child is in constant contact with our office.  The High Commissioner's office is also dealt with when there are situations of armed conflict in which case we offer summaries of our reports.
 Question: Is there any hope to push the Security Council towards new strategies for civil society in the Syrian Golan Occupied territory or Gaza? 
  • Answer: We have information from Gaza and the West bank but none from the Golan Heights.  Since we just have a newly elected first Special Representative on Violence against Children for the next three years, it is important to get a full picture and reports if you want to go ahead and provide this information you have.
 Question: How does the list of shame ensure compliance and how effective has it been? 
  • Answer: The list of shame is not a legal document.  It is a political document that comes out of the Security Council. It is a tool used to find compromise by empowering Mrs. Coomaraswamy, as well as UNICEF, OCHA and local NGOs. If the various parties do not comply, it is possible to impose various measures such as arms embargos and withdrawal of personal assets.  This list is effective as a deterrent.  In conjunction with the ICC, this works to move the Council more robustly and helps in negotiations, such as in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Cote d’Ivoire where sanctions of the Security Council imposed did stop the recruitment of child soldiers.
 Question: What is the ideal infrastructure for a community in which the child can reintegrate?  
  • Answer: It is important to not focus solely on the child but indeed on the child within the community.  Communities and families are an integral part of the peace-building process.  A programmatic response is essential.
 Question: Is there a report or list of programs which carry out community rehabilitation? What is the situation in Latin America? 
  • Answer: There is not a specific list but it has been almost 11 years since our first report was produced.  Strategic reviews and more reports on integrated programs are necessary and in the first week of June 2009 we will launch a platform describing all that we have done and learned.  Regarding South America, Colombia is on the list.  The gang situation is often brought up and this will be taken up as an issue by the newly elected first Special Representative (SRSG) on Violence against Children, Marta Santos Pais.
 Question: What else is being done to promote a fuller flourishing of the child?  
  • Answer: Ishmael Beah, another former child soldier who has turned activist and who wrote and published a book on his experience that is a must-read (A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier, www.alongwaygone.com), speaks about education and peace-building as being primordial. These can give children the skills that are more than just simple education.  Rather, these programs and projects offered through education and vocational training are a way of reintegrating and rebuilding children from within their societies.
 Question: Can you speak to the use of children as human shield, as used by Hamas? 
  • Answer: We do not look at that because for the moment, the list of shame is only if children are recruited and used directly as child soldiers.  With regards to human shields, it is briefly mentioned in our last report. However, Hamas is not listed on our list of shame because there are no facts that back up this as evidence.  The Taliban and Al Quaida are on the list however.
 Question: What is the family dynamics where the children go for safety? 
  • Answer: Some children "voluntarily" leave to become child soldiers because of problems in the home such as violence.  Often the children do not know much better than their situation, so they opt to stay as soldiers.  When the children come back home, their mothers find it difficult to discipline them.
 Question: How many nations use child soldiers? 
  • Answer: There are 19 groups which are consistent violators and 56 that recruit.  The number is estimated at 250,000 to 300,000 child soldiers worldwide.

Visit Our Partners